Legal Opinion

Warren v. Warren

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1963No. 7799PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a motion by the appellee, plaintiff in a divorce action below, for the assessment against the appellant, her former husband and the defendant below, of attorney’s fees arising from the appeal and costs on appeal. A similar motion was made in the superior court and denied by that court for- the reason that it had lost its jurisdiction in the matter because of the appeal.

The action of the superior court in denying the motion for the reason stated was erroneous. In Ackel v. Ackel, 57 Ariz. 14, 110 P.2d 238, 133 A.L.R. 549, rehearing denied 57 Ariz. 118, 111 P.2d 628, 133 A. L.R. 556…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whitfield Transportation, Inc. v. BrooksArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Ackel v. AckelArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Ackel v. AckelArizona Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  2. Baragan v. EymanArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Drees v. DreesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  4. Genda v. GendaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API