Legal Opinion

Roberts v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 13, 1907No. 3690PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDEBSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of slander, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $100, and prosecutes this appeal.

Appellant made a motion to quash the information on the ground that it did not charge an offense. The offense charged is that appellant did impute to a female in this State, to wit: M. E. Cook and Topsey Cook, a want of chastity, to wit: The said J. W. Boberts in the presence and hearing of I. T. Titus and Bufe Green, falsely, maliciously and wantonly did say of and concerning the said M. E. Cook and Topsey Cook, in substance as follows, to wit: “Old Cook’s folks…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902
  2. Denton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
  3. Barnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  4. Collins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  5. Whitehead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. State v. HosmerOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Crane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API