Kentucky Utilities Co. v. United States Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.
The Kentucky Utilities Company has petitioned this court to review two orders issued by the respondent Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (F.E.R.C./Commission.) Specifically, the utility has requested review of the cancellation notice provisions which the F.E.R.C. has mandated for the Kentucky Utilities Company contracts with the intervening parties.
The intervenors, the Kentucky municipalities of Barbourville, Bardstown, Benham, Corbin, Falmouth, Madisonville and Providence, the Electric & Water Plant Board of Frankfort, and Berea College (Berea, Ky.), each purchase…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Levine v. WeisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- The Dayton Power And Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Kentucky Utilities Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985