Legal Opinion

Hitchman v. Burkey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 8, 1989No. 85570; CA A43831PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Plaintiffs appeal a judgment for defendant. They brought separate actions against Maxine Hooper during her lifetime to foreclose liens for agricultural services. ORS 87.226(1).1 After the court consolidated the cases, Hooper died, and the court substituted the personal representative of her estate as defendant. Defendant moved for summary judgment, arguing that the liens were invalid as a matter of law on the grounds that the lien notices included items for nonlienable services that could not be segregated without extrinsic testimony and that the notices asserted liens on nonlienable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chiles v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. Hays v. PiggOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Hallmark, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Magee v. DyrdahlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API