Legal Opinion
Tamez v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided April 28, 2008No. Civil Action 6:07cv362PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER, District Judge.
The Petitioner Raul Garza Tamez, proceeding pro se, filed this application for the writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 complaining of the legality of his conviction. This Court ordered that the case be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and (3) and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrate Judges.
Tamez complained of a conviction…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Greer, David AKA David Duane GreerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015