Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Hobbs

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 15, 1884PublishedCited by 45 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Weld County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHelm, J.

This is a civil action, brought to recover damages for malicious prosecution and false imprisonment. Plaintiff procured a verdict, and judgment was duly entered thereon. Defendant prosecutes this appeal and assigns in support thereof numerous errors. The most important of these assignments is one which relates to the measure of damages adopted in the court below.

*542Upon this subject the following instruction was there given: “That the measure of damages in an action for malicious prosecution is not confined alone to actual pecuniary loss sustained by reason thereof; but if it is believed, from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. SwinefordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Slomer v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Edwards v. LeavittSupreme Court of Vermont · 1873

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Tuttle v. RaymondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. G.M. Brod & Company, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. U.S. Home Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Kirk v. Denver Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. French v. DeaneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API