Legal Opinion

Logan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 6, 1932No. 574PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"VAUGHT, District Judge.

This suit was brought by the United States, at the request of the Secretary of the Interior, for and on behalf of the Secretary, for and in its own behalf, and for and on behalf of Rhoda Wheeler Ridge, a full-blood restricted Osage Indian, and ward of the plaintiff, to recover excess payments under the Act of March 3, 1921, § 4 (41 Stat. 1250) that came into the hands of Carl T. Matthews, guardian of said Indian. The Supreme Court in 1924 held in Work v. United States ex rel. Lynn, 266 U. S. 161, 45 S. Ct. 39, 69 L. Ed. 223, that said section 4 limited the amounts to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. CandelariaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Work v. United States Ex Rel. LynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. United States v. CandelariaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Drummond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Roberts v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  3. United States v. DollarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1951
  4. River Valley, Inc. v. Dubuque CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API