Legal Opinion

Town of Castleton v. Town of Weybridge

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 15, 1874Published

Appeal from an order of removal of Florence Jones, a pauper, from the town of Castleton to the town of Weybridge. Plea, that the pauper was unduly removed, and trial by the court, September term, 1873, Wheeler, J.,.presiding.

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of removal of Florence Jones, a pauper, from the town of Castleton to the town of Weybridge. Plea, that the pauper was unduly removed, and trial by the court, September term, 1873, Wheeler, J.,.presiding. On trial it appeared that the pauper had no home anywhere to which she had any right; that she came to Castleton with a present intention of remaining there, and that she did remain there in pursuance of that intention, until removed by the order in this case ; that the pauper was married to one William J. Jones, at Hampton, in the state of New York, on'the 29th day of…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Ross, J.

The court has invariably required a full and literal compliance with the statute in the service of warnings under the act of 1797. The town o| towns to be affected by such warning, were not made parties thereto, and could only judge of the sufficiency of the warning and return, from what appeared of record in the town clerk’s office of the town instituting the proceedings. The whole proceeding was in invitum, both as to the persons and towns to be affected thereby. The defeat of the acquirement of a settlement by warning, was a right conferred…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marvin v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1826
  2. Town of Barnet v. Town of ConcordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1832
  3. Reading v. RockinghamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1827
  4. Town of Barre v. Town of MorristownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1832

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API