Legal Opinion

United States v. Cervantes-Sarmiento

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 20, 2003No. 02-41631PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.*

Rodolfo Cervantes-Sarmiento appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being found in the United States, without permission, following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). For the first time on appeal, Cervantes-Sarmiento argues that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional on its face and as applied in his case because it treats a prior conviction for a felony or aggravated felony as a sentencing factor and not as an element of the offense. He contends that the unconstitutional portion of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 should be severed from the statute. He asks us…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. United States v. DabeitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chigozie Iwouha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Chigozie Iwouha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API