United States v. Cervantes-Sarmiento
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.*
Rodolfo Cervantes-Sarmiento appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being found in the United States, without permission, following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). For the first time on appeal, Cervantes-Sarmiento argues that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional on its face and as applied in his case because it treats a prior conviction for a felony or aggravated felony as a sentencing factor and not as an element of the offense. He contends that the unconstitutional portion of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 should be severed from the statute. He asks us…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. DabeitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chigozie Iwouha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Chigozie Iwouha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004