State v. Bush
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtSheldon, J.
*110 This case is before us on remand from our Supreme Court following its affirmance of our determination that insufficient evidence was presented at trial to sustain the conviction of the defendant, Richard Bush, for racketeering in violation of General Statutes § 53-393 et seq. The Supreme Court disagreed, however, with this court's determination that the defendant was entitled to a new trial on the other charges of which he had been found guilty-six counts each of sale of narcotics and sale of narcotics within 1500 feet of a school, and one count of conspiracy to sell narcotics-because the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. TothConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. BushSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- State v. TothSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. BushSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018