Legal Opinion
Palantir Usg, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 7, 2018No. 2017-1465PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Stoll, Circuit Judge.
The government appeals from a permanent injunction on its solicitation of bids for Distributed Common Ground System - Army Increment 2 ("DCGS-A2"), the Army's primary system for processing and disseminating multi-sensor intelligence and weather information. The United States Court of Federal Claims granted the injunction after concluding that the Army failed to comply with the requirements of 10 U.S.C. § 2377 . We affirm.
BACKGROUND 1
Palantir USG, Inc. ("Palantir") filed a pre-award bid protest in the Court of Federal Claims, challenging the Army's solicitation 2 for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Dyncorp International, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Harmonia Holdings Group, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Xotech, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Afge Local 3599 v. E.E.O.C.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Prestonback v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.