Legal Opinion

United States v. 1020 Electronic Gambling MacHines

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided December 10, 1998No. CS-98-265-FVSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING FORFEITURE

VAN SICKLE, District Judge.

THIS MATTER came before the Court based upon cross motions for summary judgment. The United States was represented by Assistant United States Attorneys James R. Shively and Thomas O. Rice. The Spokane Tribe of Indians was represented by Scott D. Crowell and David R. Lundgren.

I

The Spokane Tribe of Indians (“Tribe”) is operating 1020 electronic gambling machines on its reservation. The United States seeks the machines’ forfeiture under the Johnson Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1171-1178. The Tribe has filed a claim to the machines, see Rule C(6),…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API