Legal Opinion

City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 13, 2003PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Judge.

In these consolidated appeals from orders of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC), we are asked whether under the Natural Gas Choice and Competition Act 1 (Gas Choice Act) the PUC can increase Philadelphia Gas Works’ (PGW) municipal service rates without approval from Philadelphia City Council. We affirm, holding that City Council approval is not necessary.

The City of Philadelphia (City) is a home rule municipality. 2 The City owns PGW, a collective name for all the real and personal property by which the City furnishes gas to its customers and itself. See…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public UtilitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Brockway Glass Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Philadelphia Facilities Management Corp. v. BiesterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Action Alliance of Senior Citizens of Greater Philadelphia, Inc. v. Philadelphia Gas CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. ARIPPA v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Utility Workers Union, Local 69 v. Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Philadelphia Gas Works v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. ARIPPA v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. J.L. Moyer v. PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API