Legal Opinion

Brown v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 25, 1962No. 39767PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice.

Defendants-in-error, who owned an undivided interest in the property involved in this action, commenced proceedings to determine the death and heirship of Hagen Maytubby, determine the interest of the respective parties, quiet title to the property and for partition of the same. Plaintiff-in-error, Flora Bell Brown Maytubby, the surviving spouse of Hagen Maytubby, contested the action on the grounds that (1) the property constituted her homestead and could not be partitioned; or if all the property did not constitute her homestead she was entitled to her homestead rights on her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Gottsch v. IrelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Greenshaw v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. In Re Musselman's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Clark v. KinderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frost v. BlockwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Wood v. BiggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Henslee v. HerringSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API