Legal Opinion

Ellerbeck v. Haws

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1953No. 8010PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Is the following an absolute will?

“Sept. 29, 1951
“To whom it may concern:
“Being in the Holy Cross Hospital from digestive and other troubles, in the event I do not survive, Mrs. Ruth Clayton Haws is to take total charge of my home and such little business as may exist there. Further, she is to have my complete portion of the estate left by my father, namely Witton W. Ellerbeck.
“Ben B Ellerbeck
“P.S. I appoint Mrs. Ruth Clayton Haws to serve as executrix without bond.
“B. B. Ellerbeck” (Emphasis ours.)

*231The will was entirely written, dated, and signed by the hand of the testator…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Eaton v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Dougherty v. HolscheiderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  3. Phelps v. AshtonTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Walker v. HibbardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  5. Barber v. BarberIllinois Supreme Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of KruegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Mason v. MasonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Re Baum's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Ellerbeck v. HawsUtah Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API