Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Bank of America, N.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 24, 2016No. 5D13-4416PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Daniela Floyd appeals the trial Court’s final summary judgment of foreclosure. The record indicates that there are genuine issues of material fact related to Bank of America’s standing to foreclose and the admissibility of the evidence relied on by Bank of America in its motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, we find that summary judgment was inappropriate and remand for further proceedings.

The original note and mortgage, executed in 2006, identified Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (“Countrywide?) as the lender. After Floyd failed to make the payments required by the note, BAC Home Loans…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. McLean v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Riggs v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. Rigby v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  5. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. LippiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. LESLINE RUSSELL v. BAC HOME LOANS SVCNG L.P., ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. LESLINE RUSSELL v. BAC HOME LOANS SVCNG L.P., ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., AS TRUSTEE v. RANDOLPH v. COOKDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API