Legal Opinion

City of Quincy v. Diamond Construction Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 16, 2002No. 4-01-0328PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knecht

The plaintiff, City of Quincy (City), initiated an eminent domain action to acquire a portion of defendant, Diamond Construction Company’s (Diamond), property to complete a street-extension project. The City, during a five-month period, procured two strikingly different appraisals of Diamond’s property. The first appraisal was obtained before Diamond, in reliance on the City’s definite plan to acquire its property, began to relocate its asphalt plant to ensure it would be operational for the next year’s construction season. The City’s second appraisal was obtained on the date the condemnation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  2. City of Chicago v. AnthonyIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Forest Preserve District v. Lehmann Estate, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Chicago & Western Indiana Railroad v. HeidenreichIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Sanitary District of Rockford v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bachman v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. Chapman v. Hubbard Woods Motors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Hawkes v. Casino Queen, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. Board of County Commissioners of County of Weld v. DPG Farms, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Bachman v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API