Legal Opinion

Martin v. Martin

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1981No. Docket No. 50859PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBeasley, J.

In early 1979, defendant-appellee, Blanche Martin, filed a petition and then an amended petition to reduce child support and alimony and, apparently, to set aside the judgment of divorce on the basis that he had been coerced into signing a consent agreement while emotionally upset and under the care of a psychiatrist. After hearing, the trial court found that no fraudulent inducement had occurred, but otherwise granted defendant-appellee’s petition and reduced the child support and alimony. Plaintiff-appellant, Josephine 5. Martin, appeals as of right.

The parties had been married in 1966 and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Butler v. ButlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Firnschild v. FirnschildMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Edgar v. EdgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Oknaian v. OknaianMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Hettiger v. HettigerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tinkle v. TinkleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API