Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 19, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant third-party plaintiff New York City Transit Authority and the defendant Raul Allen appeal, and the third-party defendant, Brian Rauchfuss, separately appeals, as limited by their briefs, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), entered June 4, 1999, as, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability finding the New York City Transit Authority and Raul Allen 10% at fault in the happening of the accident, and the third-party defendant Brian Rauchfuss 90% at fault, and a jury verdict on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crosland v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Conrad v. County of WestchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Hines v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jansen v. C. Raimundo & Son Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. U.W. Marx, Inc. v. Bonded Concrete, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Conte v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Carrasquillo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API