Masters Group International, Inc. v. Comerica Bank

¶110 The one issue upon which this Court unanimously agrees is that the District Court erred by allowing the jury to consider the TARP evidence. Prom that unanimous premise, the opinions diverge as to whether or not the erroneous admission of the TARP evidence compels reversal and remand. Justice Cotter, joined by Chief Justice McGrath and Justice Wheat, concludes that the admission of the TARP evidence *35does not warrant a new trial. Concurrence and Dissent, ¶ 134. Based on my review of the record in this matter, I am compelled to conclude otherwise. I therefore concur with the majority on…