Legal Opinion

Arriaga v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 30, 2010No. AC 30272PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The petitioner, Nelson E. Arriaga, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over his petition and, in the alternative, that he was denied his due process rights as a result of the court’s failure to appoint counsel to review his petition prior to the court’s dismissal of his petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

Our review of the record reveals the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Ajadi v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. Oliphant v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  4. Young v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  5. McCleave v. John J. Flanagan Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Abdullah v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. Arriaga v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  3. Byrd v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  4. Dinham v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  5. Gilchrist v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API