Legal Opinion

United States v. Apel

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 25, 2012No. 11-50003Published

1Opinion of the Court

676 F.3d 1202 (2012)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

John Dennis APEL, Defendant-Appellant.

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

John Dennis Apel, Defendant-Appellant.

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

John Dennis Apel, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 11-50003, 11-50004, 11-50005.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 13, 2012.

Filed April 25, 2012.

André Birotte, Jr., Robert E. Dugdale, and Mark R. Yohalem (argued), United States Attorney's Office, Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.

Erwin Chemerinsky, Selwyn Chu, law…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. ApelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API