In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Klenk
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by Fritz Klenk, as administrator, etc., from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county, entered in said court on the 21st day of April, 1914.
1Per curiam
The husband and wife became joint tenants of the $14,000 deposited (Kelly v. Beers, 194 N. Y. 49; Matter of Meehan, 59 App. Div. 156; Platt v. Grubb, 41 Hun, 447; Matter of Kaupper, 141 App. Div. 54; Kelly v. Home Savings Bank, 103 id. 141; Sanford v. Sanford, 45 N. Y. 723; McElroy v. Albany Savings Bank, 8 App. Div. 46), and the husband was not ousted from such tenancy by her withdrawal of the money and by the deposit of it elsewhere, or by loaning a part of it and receiving a note therefor. (O'Connor v. Dunnigan, 158 App. Div. 334.) The decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kelly v. . BeersNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Sanford v. . SanfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of KaupperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of MeehanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- McElroy v. Albany Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
3Cited by8 opinions
- Matter of Neglia v. . ZimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Commrade v. CommradeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Bruff v. Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1925
- Bruff v. Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1922
- Ohanian v. OhanianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.