Union National Bank v. Marr's Administrator
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 88 — PETITION ORDINARY — CITED 2 Duvall, 380-83, Berry v. Southern Bank of Kentucky. 3 Bush, 398, Leathers v. Commercial Insurance Co. ■Wheaton (Lawrence’s) pages 544, 556, 636, 533. 8 Oranch, 155, The Rapid. 1 Kent. 55. Story on Bills, sections 308, 365. Constitution of the United States, sec. 8, art. 1. Story on Constitution, sec. 1177 eb seg.
Read the full summary
Case 88 — PETITION ORDINARY — CITED 2 Duvall, 380-83, Berry v. Southern Bank of Kentucky. 3 Bush, 398, Leathers v. Commercial Insurance Co. ■Wheaton (Lawrence’s) pages 544, 556, 636, 533. 8 Oranch, 155, The Rapid. 1 Kent. 55. Story on Bills, sections 308, 365. Constitution of the United States, sec. 8, art. 1. Story on Constitution, sec. 1177 eb seg. United States Statutes at Large, Act of July 13, 1861. CITED Story on Bills, secs. 037, 338-330, 384, 397, 398, note 3, 383-884. Chitty on Bills, 9th edition, pages 335, 339, 330, 336, 454. 3 Metcalfe, 381, Landrum v. Trowbridge. 3 Marshall, 616.…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE HARDIN
delivered the opinion oe the court.
This was an ordinary action by the appellant, as the holder of a bill of exchange .for $ 1,262.50, dated at Charleston, Missouri, the 10th day of June, 1861, drawn by P. N. Marr upon Samuel Y. Thomas, New Orleans, Louisiana, payable to the order of Thomas Allen, and indorsed by him and Shelby Sheets.
It appears that the bill was presented for acceptance in New Orleans on the 17th of July, 1861, and thereupon protested for non-acceptance, of which notices addressed to the parties were mailed by the notary to the agents of the plaintiff, but it does…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Landrum v. Trowbridge, Dwight & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
- Leathers v. Commercial InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1867