Legal Opinion

Schurman v. Schurman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1932No. File No. 7267PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudodph, J.

Garnishment proceedings were commenced in the circuit court. A motion to dismiss the garnishment proceedings, based upon affidavits, was made by the garnishee defendants. After hearing, the trial court entered its order dismissing the garnishment proceedings. The order contained no recital upon what the order was based; neither was there filed therewith the certificate of the judge who entered the order designating upon what the order was based. The attempted appeal is from this order.

Rule 6, adopted for trial courts of record, provides as follows: “All orders must forthwith be filed. When…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Farmers' & Merchants' State Bank of Hecla v. MichaelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Anderson v. BruflatSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Rodman v. RodmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Nelson v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. HallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. MacK v. Kranz Farms, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API