Legal Opinion

Tanner v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 1, 1996No. CR 95-1064PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADLEY D. Jesson, Chief Justice.

The issue on appeal is whether the appellant was denied his right to a speedy trial under the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure. We conclude that he was, and reverse and dismiss his convictions.

The appellant was arrested on January 12, 1994. No information was filed against him until August 17, 1994. In that information, and in an amended information filed December 22, 1994, he was charged with twelve drug-related counts. On March 21, 1995, he was tried and convicted on eleven of those counts: five counts of delivery of cocaine, three counts of delivery of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Novak v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. MacK v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Duncan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Stanley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Moody v. Arkansas County Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Gwin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. DeAsis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API