Legal Opinion
National Supply Co. v. Southern Creamery Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 10, 1932No. 6 Div. 911PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The Southern Creamery Company of Oklahoma sued the National Supply Company, doing business in Birmingham, Ala., for breach of an implied warranty and for deceit in the sale of paint for use on brine coils in a storage refrigerating room of said creamery, and from a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, defendant prosecutes this appeal.
Count 8 for breach of warranty, and count 9 for deceit, were in Code form, and sufficient. Herring, Farrell & Sherman v. Skaggs, 73 Ala. 446; Cooper v. Slaughter, 175 Ala. 211, 57 So. 477.
Count 6 is for breach of an implied warranty in the sale of the paint,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anvil Mining Co. v. HumbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. HollandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Williams v. BedenbaughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- King v. Livingston Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Cooper v. SlaughterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Inter-Ocean Insurance Company v. BanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Kilborn v. HendersonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
- Creamery Package Mfg. Co. v. FieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Friedman v. KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
- American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. LowerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.