Legal Opinion

Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 24, 1992No. 05-91-01561-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Justice.

This is a declaratory-judgment action tried on stipulated facts. Trinity, as subro-gee to its insured’s rights, sued Fidelity. The trial court found for Fidelity. Trinity contends the trial court erred because Fidelity was also liable for the loss. We reverse and render.

NATURE OF THE CASE

Trinity and Fidelity stipulated to the facts and documentary evidence. The trial court’s judgment states:

The Plaintiffs and Defendant appeared by counsel and announced ready. Counsel for both parties presented to the Court an agreed Stipulation of Facts. Thereafter, Plaintiffs filed with…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Johnson v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Oake v. Collin CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. RepublicBank Dallas, N.A. v. Interkal, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Simmons v. ArnimTexas Supreme Court · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hasty Inc. v. Inwood Buckhorn Joint Venture, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995
  2. City of Galveston v. Giles, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  3. McLendon v. McLendon, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  4. White v. Sullins, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1996
  5. City of Harlingen v. Avila, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API