Legal Opinion

Turnbull v. Moulton

New York County Courts

Decided November 20, 1972PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas R. Hadaway, J.

On the calendar call of the above action, the attorneys for the respective parties answered that the case was ready for trial, except that a physical examination of one of the plaintiffs, requested by the defendant, had not been ¡held, for the reason that the plaintiff objected to the doctor proposed by the defendant to make the examination. No reason was given for the objection of the doctor proposed by the defendant, except for the statement of the plaintiff’s attorney that the doctor proposed was “ a defense oriented doctor ”.

There is no proof, before the court, to sustain this contention…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Black v. BisgierNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Adamian v. StrandwallNew York Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reardon v. Port AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Olin v. BeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API