Cross Contracting Co. v. Law

(specially concurring in part and dissenting in part):

As to the cross-appeal only, I would reverse. The District Court found there was no pending freight because there was no voyage, and the majority opinion appears to do the same. The term “voyage” is not a qualitative term describing the type of endeavor in which a vessel is engaged and restricting limitation of liability proceedings to those vessels which move across the water from one point to, another. It is a sequential term, separating one adventure or undertaking or trip from another, employed as a means of dividing the activities of…