Bayliss v. Bayliss

HOLMES, Judge.

This is a divorce case.

The wife appeals contending the trial court erred to reversal in refusing to grant her motion for a new trial. We find no merit in this contention and affirm.

As we view the wife’s motion for a new trial, it is bottomed on the premise that since there was no court reporter present at the trial of the divorce, she cannot obtain effective appellate review unless a new trial, where a court reporter would be present, is granted. Hence, the trial court erred in refusing to grant the motion.

As seen from the above, the trial court denied the wife’s motion.

The wife…