Legal Opinion

Kiilunen v. Moodie

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 1974No. Docket 16917PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals from the trial judge’s refusal to set aside a default judgment entered when defense counsel failed to appear for a scheduled pretrial conference. Defense counsel claimed lack, of official notice as justification for his nonappearance at the pretrial conference.

GCR 1963, 301.9 authorizes the taking of a default when the counsel fails to appear for a pretrial conference:

"Default. Failure to appear at a duly scheduled pretrial conference, unless said conference has been waived in accordance with sub-rule 301.8, shall constitute a default to which provisions of GCR 520 shall be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Milinsky v. Schmidt, Ellis & Associates, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Mission Investment Co. v. Perfect Totalisator Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. May v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API