Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stimson v. District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1923No. 2590Published

1DissentColeman, J.

I dissent from the order denying the petition for a rehearing. I concurred in the opinion in this case with great reluctance, feeling that perhaps the conclusions of my esteemed associates were entitled to more consideration than my own, but, after a more thorough investigation of the matter, I am convinced that the writ should not issue.

This is an original proceeding in prohibition. Our statute provides: “The writ of prohibition is the counterpart of the writ of mandate. It arrests the proceedings of any tribunal, corporation, board, or person, *162whether exercising functions judicial or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Snydacker v. BrosseIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Craig v. CraigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. State ex rel. Finch v. DuncanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Irving National Bank v. District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Nelson v. ChittendenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API