Legal Opinion

Haygood v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 2, 1948No. A-10835PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that it was not taken within the sixty days prescribed by statute. 22 O. S. 1941 § 1054. No response was filed by the defendant to the motion to dismiss.

The record discloses that judgment and sentence was pronounced against the defendant pursuant to the verdict of the jury on October 28, 1946, and at the time of the pronouncement of the judgment and sentence, the court granted the defendant an extension of thirty days from that date to make and serve the case-made.

Pursuant to the order of the court, the County Court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gunter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McLean v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Nard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Nard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API