Tisdale v. Tankersley
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
John Tisdale, by this appeal, seeks to reverse a decree of the chancery court declaring a contract he had entered into with the appellee and her husband, Arthur Tankersley, usurious.
Arthur Tankersley was in jail at Fort Smith in December of 1934 awaiting the action of the grand jury upon some felony charge. Bond, which he had been unable to make, had been fixed at $1,500. His wife, Goldie Tankersley, desiring to secure his release from custody, went to John Tisdale, who was said to be a professional bondsman and money lender, and asked Tisdale to make the bond for the release of her husband.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dickinson-Reed-Randerson Company v. StroupeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Hogan v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Rouw v. ArtsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dismute v. FurlowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Sosebee v. BoswellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Sosebee v. BoswellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Standard Leasing Corp. v. Schmidt Aviation, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Standard Leasing Corp. v. Schmidt Aviation, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.