Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided May 13, 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

Honorable D.C. Jim Dozier Montgomery County Attorney Courthouse Conroe, Texas 77301

Re: What constitutes an "improvement district" for purposes of article 1667, V.T.C.S. (RQ-1253)

Dear Mr. Dozier:

You have asked questions concerning article 1667, V.T.C.S. This statute, enacted in 1915 and most recently amended in 1941, provides in relevant part:

In all counties which have or may have a County Auditor and containing a population of [110,000] or more . . . and in which counties there exists or in which there may be created any improvement, navigation, drainage, or road or irrigation district, or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AustadMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Myra Foundation v. HarveyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Contested Case of Richview Nursing Home v. Minnesota Department of Public WelfareCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Provident Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. DoughtyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  5. Overcast v. AkraMontana Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API