Legal Opinion

People v. Berry

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 1991No. D011417PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

Michael Edward Berry was convicted of perjury following a court trial. (Pen. Code, § 118.)1 He appeals, raising the single contention the evidence of his false testimony during a family court proceeding should have been excluded from evidence in his perjury trial because of the failure of the family court to warn Berry at that time of his rights against compelled self-incrimination as established by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. (See also, Cal. Const., art. I, § 15; Evid. Code, § 940.) Based upon the record before us, we find the family law…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Cramer v. TyarsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. WarrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. People v. SeastoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. People v. SchroederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. BarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. Pena CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API