Legal Opinion

Matter of Reed

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from an order of the .Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, in the third judicial department, entered January 12, 1916, which affirmed an order of the Warren County Surrogate’s Court directing a sale of real estate of Henry M. Bailey, deceased, for payment of an alleged debt.

1Per curiam

This is an application for leave to sell the real estate of the decedent to pay his debts. When the matter was before this court on a former appeal (214 N. Y. 383) we held that the proceedings were defective, because it was a case which required the publication of a citation to unknown creditors, and that requirement had not been complied with. We reversed the order on that appeal and remitted the matter to the Surrogate’s Court, to the end that a citation might be properly published as the law requires.

It now appears that after the case was again in the Surrogate’s Court the petitioner…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of ReedNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re ReedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  2. Matter of ReedNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Matter of ReedNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API