Legal Opinion

Ex parte Eager

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 21, 1934No. 17310PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus by the relator seeking to be released from custody under a judgment for contempt.

It appears from the record that the commitment was issued on a mere verbal order of the judge. A district judge has no authority to commit a person for contempt on a mere verbal *98order. It is necessary that the proceedings be reduced to writing and made a matter of record in the court. Ex parte Ray, 276 S. W., 709; Ex parte McGraw, 277 S. W., 699. See also 9 , Texas Jur., 632.

It is ordered that the relator be discharged,

Relator discharged.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Ex parte McGrawCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SupercinskiCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Ex Parte HardinTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Ex Parte MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Ex Parte SpencerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Ex Parte JonesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API