Legal Opinion

Foster v. Bradbury

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 7, 2003No. 01-56890PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Donald Foster appeals the district court’s summary judgment order affirming the Bankruptcy Court’s ruling permitting the Ventura County District Attorney to collect post-petition interest on Foster’s child support arrearages after the claim was paid in full and his Chapter 13 case had been closed. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We note that Foster’s brief fails to comply with Rule 28(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, which requires specific information in appropriate sections and in the order indicated.1 While failure to comply with Fed. R.App. P.…

3Cases cited10 opinions

Bruning v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
In Re: Robert McKnight Pardee Darlene Daigle-Pardee, Debtors. Great Lakes Higher Education Corporation v. Robert McKnight Pardee Darlene Daigle-PardeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
In Re Samuel Duke Cardelucci, Debtor. Willem Onink, Marsha Onink v. Samuel Duke CardelucciCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
In Re: Artisan Woodworkers, Debtor. John C. Ward, D/B/A Artisan Woodworkers v. Board of Equalization of California, in Re: Rudy Bossert, Debtor. Rudy Bossert v. United States of America, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
County of Sacramento v. Foross (In Re Foross)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

In Re Donald Clifford Foster, Debtor, Donald Clifford Foster v. Michael Bradbury, Ventura County District Attorney, and Elizabeth Rojas, Chapter 13 Trustee, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003