Legal Opinion
Groncki v. AT & T MOBILITY LLC
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 4, 2009No. Civil Action 08-02016 (HHK)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HENRY H. KENNEDY, JR., District Judge.
Paul Groncki brings this action under section 806 of the Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley” or “SOX”), 18 U.S.C. § 1514A, alleging that his employer, AT & T Mobility LLC (“AT & T”) unlawfully terminated him in retaliation for his engagement in activity protected under SOX. AT & T moves to dismiss this suit on the grounds that (1) Groncki’s claim is barred by res judicata, or (2) Groncki’s complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted [# 6]. 1 Upon consideration of the motion,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Atherton v. District of Columbia Office of the MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jordan v. Sprint Nextel Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2014
- Gunderson v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Dimauro v. Springfield Terminal Railway Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2016