Legal Opinion

Bowers v. Slocum

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 6, 1927No. 324PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, District Judge

(having stated the facts as above). The determination of the question raised in the ease at bar depends upon the construction of the provisions of section 219 (a) (b) (c), and section 231(6), of the Revenue Act of 1918.

The provision of section 219 (a) (1), of the Revenue Act of 1918, applied to all of the income received by the estate during the period of administration or settlement of the estate, and by subdivision (b) the duty was imposed on the executors to make a return of the income of the estate. By that act the estate became a taxpayer as distinguished from the legatees or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lederer v. StocktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Kings County Trust Co. v. LawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  3. Lederer v. StocktonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1920
  4. Kings County Trust Company v. . LawNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Stockton v. LedererDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1919

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Sun-Herald Corporation v. DugganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Citizens & Southern Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  3. Arthur Jordan Foundation v. Commissioner of Internal ReveuneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  4. Leon A. Beeghly Fund v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960
  5. Sanborn v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API