Legal Opinion
Pitrat v. Garlikov
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 21, 1992No. 90-15252PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*1022In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Patterson v. Shumate, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 2242, 119 L.Ed.2d 519 (1992), the majority and dissenting opinions filed in this case on October 25, 1991 are hereby withdrawn.
Ronald S. Garlikov and James Flindall filed voluntary petitions for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 7 of the bankruptcy code on April 29, 1988. Reda S. Garlikov filed a similar petition on June 1, 1988. Ronald and Reda Garlikov (Garlikov) are husband and wife. Their cases were consolidated for joint administration.
Garlikov and Flindall (the Bankrupts) claimed that their interests…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- 13 Collier bankr.cas.2d 793, Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,763, 7 Employee Benefits Ca 1096 in Re Howard Douglas Daniel, Debtor. Howard Douglas Daniel, Debtor-Appellant v. Security Pacific National Bank, Commercial Bank of San Francisco, Leasco Capital Corporation, and Capital Reserve Leasing Corporation, Creditors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Eldon S. REED, Debtor. Eldon S. REED, Appellant, v. Victoria C. DRUMMOND, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993