Legal Opinion
Stone v. York Ice MacHinery Corp.
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided November 16, 1942No. 35182PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcGehee, J.
The question presented for decision in this case is whether or not the local activity of a nonresident performed in the installation, adjustment and testing of certain air-conditioning systems in buildings located in this state and constituting a substantial part of tbe performance of the contracts for the sale of the machinery and equipment which was manufactured outside of the state by. such nonresident and shipped here in interstate commerce for use in air-conditioning such buildings, is subject to the provisions of Section 57, subsections (a) and (b), and Section 247, of Chapter 20, Laws…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Browning v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Nelson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- York Manufacturing Co. v. ColleySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- General Railway Signal Co. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Case v. Mills Novelty Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Surface Combustion Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Allen Etc. v. Van Buren Township Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1962
- Combustion Engineering, Inc. v. Arizona State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Holland Furnace Co. v. Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Monaghan v. Seismograph Service Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.