Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Thurlow

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 13, 1984Published

1DissentGlassman, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I believe the suppression justice erred in finding the initial stop of the defendant’s vehicle to be lawful. When a law enforcement official detains an individual to investigate suspected criminal activity, that individual has been seized in a fourth amendment sense. Reid v. Georgia, 448 U.S. 438, 440, 100 S.Ct. 2752, 2753, 65 L.Ed.2d 890 (1980); State v. Rand, 430 A.2d 808, 817 (Me.1981). Because the fourth amendment requires that all seizures be reasonable, a police officer is not free to detain an individual absent justifying circumstances. United States v. Cortez,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Reid v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. State v. RandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. State v. GriffinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API