Legal Opinion

Turner v. Cupp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 8, 1980No. 114,318, CA 17700PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

This is a post-conviction relief proceeding in which petitioner alleged that an incorrect representation by his trial attorney concerning the effect of the Oregon State Parole Board’s "matrix system” and the effect of a minimum sentence caused him to enter a guilty plea to a charge of murder. The trial court found that the petitioner had, in fact, been misled, but determined that he was not prejudiced and therefore denied post-conviction relief. We reverse.

Petitioner was charged with Murder in the First Degree in Lane County. On the date the case was set for trial, petitioner was optimistic…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Billy J. Spradley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hartzog v. KeeneyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Turner v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API