McDaniel v. State

The errors insisted on are that the district judge did not charge all the law applicable to the case, and that the statement of facts is furnished by the judge, and is not full enough to set forth the evidence correctly, and does not; that the counsel had the whole term to furnish a statement of facts, and that the judge should have waited on their so doing, in order to adjourn his court.

The business of the term does not appear to have required the judge to keep his court open the whole of the two weeks allowed by law, and the counsel not furnishing a statement of facts, the _ court did,…