Legal Opinion

Matter of A.H. Dugrenier, Inc. v. McGoldrick

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Our decision of this case (281 N. Y. 608) was made solely on the ground that the Legislature could not empower the city to tax the proceeds of transactions in interstate commerce. The issue as to whether transactions of the character in question are within the scope of the enabling act (L. 1934, ch. 873) was not considered by us. But that question is no longer open on this record, since our remittitur on which the case was certified to the Supreme Court of the United States recites that we affirmed the order of the Appellate Division “ upon the sole ground that the City Sales Tax Law as here…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of A.H. Dugrenier, Inc. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United Autographic Register Co. v. McGoldrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API