Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Grant

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 20, 1962No. 7378PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CHADICK, Chief Justice.

This is a venue case. The defendants, interposed a plea of privilege to be sued in Madison, the County of their residence, and. the plaintiffs controverted the plea, asserting venue in Rusk County by reason of the exception from the General Rule of Venue authorized by Subdivision 9a, Art-1995.

The appellants, Metta Rives Armstrong and her husband, M. V. Armstrong, have briefed points of error that there is no evidence, and insufficient evidence to sustain the trial judge’s implied finding that Mrs. Armstrong’s negligence was the proximate-cause of the injuries sustained…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cavanaugh v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Woodward v. OrtizTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Jess Edwards, Inc. v. FoleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zube v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API