B.B. v. State

B.B., a sixteen-year-old juvenile, appeals a non-final order1 waiving him into adult court to face charges alleging five counts of first-degree inten*205tional homicide, contrary to sec. 940.01, Stats.2 He contends that the juvenile court unreasonably exercised its discretion by waiving him into adult court because it improperly weighed his best interests equally with the public's interests and because it did not consider the legislative amendment to the extended jurisdiction statute.

We conclude that the juvenile court gave paramount consideration to the best interests of B.B., and properly…